TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 3 / PID.SUS-TPK / 2018 / PN TPG ( STUDI PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI )
Corruption crime has become an extraordinary crime (extraordinary crime) so that the return of state assets is pursued by applying additional penalties in the form of payment of criminal substitute money. In order to optimize the implementation of payment of replacement money, the Supreme Court has issued Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning Supplementary Criminal Money in Corruption in the context of providing equal understanding to law enforcers, especially Judges in the application of the Supreme Court Regulations for Corruption Defendants. The problems in this thesis, namely: How is the Judge's consideration in passing verdict No.3 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2018 / PNTpg on the payment of replacement money. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The type of research is descriptive-qualitative using secondary data. The results showed that the Judge in deciding case No.3 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2018 / PNTpg in criminal criminal replacement money was inaccurate in part in the provisions of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning Supplementary Criminal Additional Money in Corruption Crime Acts so that the Criminal Money Decision Substitutes in the case are not effective.