EVALUASI PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN (PKH) DI KELURAHAN REMPANG CATE KECAMATAN GALANG KOTA BATAM

Abstract

The Keluarga Harapan Program (PKH) in Rempang Cate Village has been implemented since 2016. PKH is a conditional assistance to beneficiary families (KPM) which has three components, namely education, health and social welfare. Galang Subdistrict which is one of three sub-districts in Batam City which is aarea hinterlandhinterland or. The geographical location and lifestyle of Rempang Cate Village are different. The condition of the area, which consists of islands and coastal areas, makes the livelihood of fishermen the majority of the population of Rempang Cate. In addition, the location of the Rempang Cate Village is far from the sub-district capital and the city center.

This study uses descriptive qualitative research methods and data collection techniques using the observation method by looking at the conditions and behavior of the community in Rempang Cate Village. The second method is interviews conducted between researchers and PKH implementers and facilitators. Then themethod was Focus Group Discussion (FGD) carried out with KPM in Rempang Cate. And the last method is documentation in the form of recorded records during interviews with PKH implementers, lists of KPM participants in Galang District and other documentation in the field related to PKH implementation.

The results of this study indicate that the implementation of PKH in Rempang Cate Village is seen from the indicators of the evaluation theory used, namely effectiveness, equity and responsiveness. The effectiveness in implementing PKH in this village has been effective because the positive impact and objectives of the PKH program itself have been met, such as the education component, a reduction in the dropout rate for primary and secondary school age, and an increase in the health status of the community through their visits to the health center. The indicators of equity and responsiveness by the community are considered to be still lacking, because many people complain about the inaccuracy of data collection on the target recipients of this assistance program.